System combat patrol strategic missile submarines, since 1992 gradually degraded

[DARPA]

Today I have good news regarding the main component of our nuclear deterrent - a strategic submarine fleet.

First, the bad and the worst - that we have had so far and we have so far in this area:

1. The system of combat patrol strategic missile submarines, since 1992 gradually degraded. If in 1986 the General Staff Intelligence Navy US recorded the simultaneous presence of various maritime zones 34 submarines of the USSR, in 1995 the Pentagon has stated only one boat "Shark", and that its area of ​​responsibility was limited to northern Europe.
Activity Russian nuclear Ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) to the US, even in 2012 is estimated as insignificant. Pentagon intelligence (DIA) found that during the year the Russian "strategists" have managed to make a total of five "avtonomok" with the bases of the Northern and Pacific fleets. For comparison - at the height of the Cold War, one only in 1984 the Soviet Navy carried out in the oceans 102 combat patrols nuclear submarine.

2. In fact, our country in the 90s lost naval component of the nuclear triad and was extremely vulnerable to massive nuclear strike potential enemy.

3. Part of the program was resumed patrol only in 2006, after having been refurbished and modernized 5 submarines operated by the Navy. All they had previously stood on the bases of the fact that there were technical problems involving a risk to the safety of the crew and the ship itself.

4. However, even after the commissioning of the repaired "sharks" to resume full combat duty failed because of the number of submarines is not enough, because five boats usually only one "works" in the seas, and the rest either in reserve or on a scheduled technical prevention.

5. In addition, an extensive system of special communication of the sub range, using submersibles that can communicate with the command, as in fact was destroyed and satellite constellation - impotent - her cover was insufficient for reliable reception in all sectors of the world's oceans.

6. Therefore, the strategic submarine patrols in 2006 and so far limited to maritime zones of the Arctic Ocean and a small part of the Pacific Ocean, and patrols of one (1) missile, and then - not always.

These are my friends, the sad reality that we see in this thread.

BUT! A few days ago the Russian leadership made an important decision:

"Russia will start patrolling the global nuclear submarine strategic purpose."

Combat duty will occur in all sectors of the world's oceans, including the shores of all five continents.

This will be achieved as follows:

1. It has launched an updated satellite fleet with long-radio transmitting systems - to communicate with submarines at any point.

2. Adoption of the Navy nuclear submarines of the new generation - the three Project 955 "Borey" ballistic missile submarines and two shock 885M "Ash-M" with strategic cruise missiles X-102 on board - that have compared with the "sharks" more large margin autonomously and significantly greater secrecy.

3. Combat Duty submarine fleet decided to make a global, including previously inaccessible ocean zone. Presence in various sectors of the world's oceans will occur until selectively, with the rotation of special secret algorithm, but since 2017, with the commissioning of all ordered "Boreas" (9 units) and "Ash" (10 pieces) the intensity of patrols closer to Soviet standards.

4. Currently available Russia has nine nuclear submarines, which are in the Northern and Pacific fleets.

5. With the adoption of the Navy in the Battle of strategic submarines class "Northwind" missile submarines, not only will continue to patrol the Arctic, Atlantic and Pacific, but will resume execution of combat missions in areas where the collapse of the USSR, they did not appear - it will be renewed patrol in the southern latitudes, which will solve the problems of strategic nuclear deterrence, not only across the North, but also through the South Pole.

6. Of particular importance in this subject will have low noise impact submarines "Ash", which are able to approach undetected to the shores of our main strategic partner and hit cruise missiles X-102 with a nuclear warhead his base and control centers. Volley just one such submarine in a few minutes can turn into radioactive ashes the entire east coast of the US, because the CD X-102 does not need to go on a ballistic trajectory!

These are good news, my friends!

I want to mention: the Russian leadership understands that the deployment of the US global missile defense system "Aegis":

http://sntdpni.livejournal.com/185926.html

clearly indicates that the US is preparing a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia. Oppose the aggressive plans of the US, we can only dull quantitative buildup of highly trudnoporazhaemyh systems retaliation - strategic missile submarines, as I told you in this article, and has recently resumed the project BZHRK based missiles yars:

http://sntdpni.livejournal.com/193665.html

So, I have a well-founded hope that the script "Bad nuclear war" will be changed to "Good ..." Just kidding. I hope that the nuclear explosion will not happen, a kind of "cautious optimism", as diplomats say ...

In general, we can say for sure - we only do not otbrykivatsya, but we still had to get drawn into another arms race. And now we are left spellbound watching, we have time to build retaliatory forces before the US finished debugging of its global missile defense system, and so much that "our partners" will not dare to attack us?
For all calculations the peak danger of the US pre-emptive nuclear strike against Russia accounted for 2018-2020gg.
Let us wait?